Barrett Sports Media’s editor, Demetri Ravanos, wanted us to take a break from our regularly scheduled programming and go with Election themed posts this week, given today’s monumental election.
In that spirit, I decided to reach out to a few media professionals that were gracious enough to answer a few questions for our gambling constituents. To begin with we have Ben Heisler (BH) who is a Host, Analyst, and Editor for Sports Illustrated; Scott Miller (SM) the executive editor for The Action Network; and last but not least, Bernie Fratto (BF) the National Host at FOX Sports Radio.
I hope you enjoy it and everyone get out there and vote!
How does the path to legalization change with either candidate in charge?
BH: To be honest, I thought a Trump presidency four years ago would have been positive on the federal level for legalizing sports wagering across the country. Since it hasn’t happened yet, I can’t see it happening again if he were to be elected for another four years.
I legitimately hope the Biden campaign will soon embrace sports betting and it’s growing popularity within our country. With trillions of dollars due in taxes by the end of 2025, it’s one possible way to slowly begin the process of helping to pay off the national deficit. Colorado’s budget has been reaping the benefits of marijuana legalization for years, and last September, the state generated more than $207 million in sports betting revenue! Assuming a more progressive political party wins the election, I’m optimistic to believe we will see all 50 states eventually allow for sports wagering sooner rather than later.
SM: I don’t think the winner of the presidency will impact the future of wide-spread sports betting legalization in the country. Since any movement toward legalization is happening at the state level, the most important races to keep an eye on are in the state legislature and the governor’s office. For example, in New York, State Sen. Joesph Addabbo, who has been the biggest proponent of legalizing online sports betting in NY, is up for re-election. Addabbo losing would almost surely cause a delay in any momentum for pushing a bill through in 2021 (New York currently allows for in-person betting at a few upstate casinos).
BF: Currently there are about 18 states with legalized sports betting and a handful of others who have begun legislation in some form or fashion. Irrespective of party, each state has its own legislative process and as such, given the demand and the incredible growth since the overturn of PASPA in May, 2018, the future of legalized sports betting in the United States is very bright, regardless of who will be our Commander in Chief for the next four years.
In your opinion, has sports betting activity increased, decreased or remained neutral during election season?
BH: I think it’s increased, but it’s not directly correlated to election season. We just have so many more options on the calendar, compared to when the pandemic first hit. Everything was taken away, and we were choosing between marble races and Madden simulations at one point!
SM: We’ve seen sports betting interest increase significantly in the past year. There are a variety of factors for that, most notably that multiple new states have recently started accepting online bets — Illinois, Tennessee and Colorado. I’d expect interest in sports betting to be very low on Election Day, mainly because there are no events on which to wager. But once the games come back — MACtion on Wednesday night, anyone?! — bettors will again be looking for a reprieve from election coverage.
BF: As far as regulated markets go, the election has no influence whatsoever, since you can’t bet on elections in Las Vegas, or in any other state which has legalized sports betting. Additionally, thanks to the four month COVID hiatus, the pent up demand for sports bettors has been massive. Handles in all sports have been record setting. However, it’s also worth noting, that in offshore markets, I’m told the 2020 Presidential Election will have the largest handle of any betting event in history.
Lastly, if the sports betting industry had a face of its two most popular people, who would be the President and Vice President?
BH: I suppose it depends on where you identify politically, right? Do you want the smartest candidate? The most popular candidate? The loudest voice in the room?
If I were casting my sports betting ballot, I think Todd Fuhrman is arguably one of the sharpest and brightest analysts in the space and is one of the faces of the industry both before and during its ongoing rise into everyday sports betting conversation. He’s thoughtful, well-researched, and a terrific communicator.
He could bring on my guy Joe Fortenbaugh for a hell of a running mate. Joe’s sharp, witty, and has a terrific ability to connect and grow audiences. He’s hustled everywhere he’s been and with his move to Vegas, he’s only going to become bigger and brighter in the industry.
SM: I’ll go with a Scott Van Pelt/Stuckey ticket. SVP has the biggest platform of anyone who discusses sports betting both regularly and intelligently. Stuckey, The Action Network’s self-proclaimed King of Degenerate Nation, has mass-appeal with more hardcore bettors.
BF: Hank Goldberg and Brent Musburger would have to be President and Vice President. After decades of professing their love and expertise for Sports Betting, both have since relocated to Las Vegas. But they didn’t come to town to sit on the sidelines. They are very active with their own respective modalities and in addition to being lifelong ambassadors for all things sports betting, they are still omnipresent on the airwaves.
So, there you have it folks. Question 3 is a fun one and I’d love to hear what your choices would be. Feel free to tweet me your responses at @docksquad33 on Twitter.
Vik Chokshi covered the sports betting industry for BSM. He is based in Chicago, IL and working currently for BetQL. He has written previously for The Action Network, Front Office Sports, and The Big Lead. Reach Vik by email at DockSquad33@gmail.com or follow him on Twitter @DockSquad33.
Jason Barrett Podcast: Rich Eisen, NFL Network
Rich Eisen reveals how he ended up partnering with Stuart Scott, the moment he knew he made the right move joining the NFL Network, and the influence standup comedy had on his broadcast career.
Jason Barrett is the owner and operator of Barrett Sports Media. Prior to launching BSM he served as a sports radio programmer, launching brands such as 95.7 The Game in San Francisco and 101 ESPN in St. Louis. He has also produced national shows for ESPN Radio including GameNight and the Dan Patrick Show. You can find him on Twitter @SportsRadioPD or reach him by email at JBarrett@sportsradiopd.com.
Does FOX Need West Coast College Football Success?
“I think we are all looking forward to the twelve team playoff and I don’t know if it matters as much as it did in the last eight years.”
Don’t believe them. Don’t believe those people that try to sell you on the idea that a given sport is better if a given team in said sport is good. You know, college football is better when Notre Dame is good. Maybe they tell you college basketball is better when UCLA is good. Might they say the NFL is better when the Dallas Cowboys are good? Let me tell you, whoever the they is saying those things, they are wrong. FOX isn’t living or dying on it?
I am not here to tell you college football is better when USC is good. The Trojans are ninth all-time in FBS wins with 866 victories, they claim 11 National Championships and 39 conference championships. There is zero doubt they are among the elite, blue blooded programs of the college football world. With all of that said, USC hasn’t contributed to college football’s national championship discussion in more than 15 years. But, now Southern California is back and in College Football Playoff contention.
With only Notre Dame and a PAC 12 Conference Championship left to play, 10-1 USC is in excellent position to earn the first College Football Playoff bid in school history. The Trojans would be the third west coast team in the playoffs, 2014 Oregon played in the inaugural edition and 2016 Washington was the only other PAC 12 participant. It has now been five playoffs since a PAC 12 team has been in the top four.
That brings up the obvious question, how important is it for the health of the College Football Playoff to have west coast teams involved, especially one based in Los Angeles? L.A is, of course, the second largest media market in the nation. College football is well down the list of priorities in the City of Angels but having a team in the mix might help the overall national rating.
College Football has long been criticized for becoming too regional of a sport. The results thus far do lend themselves to that belief, the only team from outside the South to win a national championship was 2014 Ohio State. The SEC has twice had two teams among the four playoff teams and two of eight championship games matched Alabama and Georgia from the SEC.
So, does the College Football Playoff need West Coast teams for long term health? FOX is one of the rights holders for PAC 12 football and the main FOX college analyst, Joel Klatt, doesn’t think it is necessary. “I don’t know if it matters this year. This is like the last two years in an eight year term for a president,” Klatt told me on my show, The Next Round, “I think we are all looking forward to the twelve team playoff and I don’t know if it matters as much as it did in the last eight years.”
To Klatt’s point, the College Football Playoff seems to be screeching towards that twelve team format and a bigger media rights deal. That deal will almost certainly include multiple networks, not just ESPN/ABC, and will be worth significantly more money than the current deal. So, it is not as if the lack of a presence west of the Rockies has hurt the attractiveness of the College Football Playoff to the networks.
On the other hand, the playoffs have never reached the lofty ratings they had year one. Was the 2014 edition just ratings lightning in a bottle or has the regional nature of the product hurt those ratings? The 2014 semi finals did fall on New Year’s Day which meant the games were played in the Rose Bowl and Sugar Bowl which has proven to be the most successful schedule in terms of ratings success.
The college football lover in me couldn’t get enough of FOX’s Saturday night USC-UCLA telecast. There’s something about both teams wearing those classic home colors and playing in that historic stadium under the lights. They put on a great show, the show also would go on without them.
I want as many people as possible exposed to college football; it only makes the sport healthier. If that means more West Coast teams need to be in the playoffs, I hope they earn their way in. An expanded playoff will only make it easier. Until then, just keep telling people college football is better when your team is good
Ryan Brown is a columnist for Barrett Sports Media, and a co-host of the popular sports audio/video show ‘The Next Round’ formerly known as JOX Roundtable, which previously aired on WJOX in Birmingham. You can find him on Twitter @RyanBrownLive and follow his show @NextRoundLive.
HBO’s ‘Shaq’ Docuseries Tells Shaquille O’Neal’s Story With Style, Personality
What ‘Shaq’ wants the audience to know is that success wasn’t easy for the man, despite his physical gifts.
From the very beginning of HBO’s Shaq docuseries, Shaquille O’Neal tells us how important storytelling is to him. Just recapping a sequence of events isn’t enough for the Hall of Famer. As the man puts it himself, “sometimes when you tell a story, you wanna add a little barbecue sauce.”
Director Robert Alexander (The Shop, A Man Named Scott) adds plenty of barbecue sauce to O’Neal’s life story, especially in the first two parts of the docuseries. (Shaq runs four episodes, with the opener debuting Wednesday, Nov. 23 at 9 p.m. ET on HBO and HBO Max. Each of the following three episodes will premiere on the subsequent Wednesday.)
Nothing less should be expected from a gigantic personality like O’Neal. This isn’t a dry documentary that simply chronicles a series of events. Alexander mixes in stock, news, and archival sports footage to add embellishment and punctuation to many stories and important points. Music, creative set design, and animation also play key roles in keeping the narrative moving and the audience engaged.
Each episode has a visual theme to it. Part 1 emulates a music video. Several comic book elements are incorporated into Part 2. Part 3 is meant to invoke a classic stage drama, a Shakespearean tragedy. Unfortunately, Part 4 is less focused in that regard, though some fun video game graphics are produced. Editors Freddie DeLaVega, Lenny Messina, and Ted Feldman deserve significant credit for making all the pieces fit together into a cohesive visual trip that gives the documentary an energy not seen in many projects like this.
Much like The Last Dance did for Michael Jordan, Shaq helps define a basketball icon for newer generations more familiar with the athletic giant from being part of TNT’s Inside the NBA panel and his many, many commercial endorsements.
The documentary begins with an adolescent O’Neal growing faster than his body and mind could handle. He wasn’t a phenom who was a superstar from the very moment he took the court, despite his obvious size advantages. And his path to major college basketball didn’t take the typical route.
Eventually, however, viewers see what those of us old enough to have watched O’Neal play at LSU remember. He looked like an adult among boys. His dunks were ferocious, raising his knees as he bent the rim to his will. And, as you might recall, young Shaq was much thinner than the diesel he became late in his professional career.
The first two episodes of Shaq chronicle O’Neal’s rise to superstardom, from college sensation at LSU to No. 1 overall NBA Draft pick by the Orlando Magic, developing into a force for whom there was no match on the court on the way to NBA championships. O’Neal was so dominant that the game had to adapt to him. Rival teams stocked their rosters with three to four big men that could each spare six fouls roughing O’Neal up and sending him to the free throw line. The NBA’s defensive rules changed to allow more double-teaming.
Parts 3 and 4 of the docuseries are less fun, as the second pair of episodes follow O’Neal’s fall from the ultimate heights of his career and difficulties in his personal life. His relationship with Kobe Bryant deteriorated and took a championship dynasty down with it. A major factor in those tensions developing was O’Neal’s reluctance to stay in shape during the offseason, continuing to put on weight, and eventually having toe surgery right before the 2002-03 season.
This is where O’Neal’s involvement and cooperation probably hurt Shaq the most. Unlike the first two episodes, when everything was going well for him, the big man doesn’t offer as much insight into his shortcomings. Particularly frustrating is his lack of accountability. At one point, O’Neal flat-out says he’s not talking about what went wrong with the Lakers.
Looking right into the camera and accepting responsibility for his role in the demise of two championship teams (later including the Miami Heat) would have been riveting. Instead, others are left to try and explain O’Neal’s actions, which feels dishonest as teammates like Rick Fox and longtime Lakers trainer Gary Vitti try to cover for him.
What Shaq wants the audience to know is that success wasn’t easy for the man, despite his physical gifts. Basketball did not come easily to him as a youth, nor did championship success in college or the NBA as he grew up. But like so many great athletes do, O’Neal channeled criticism from the media and slights from opponents including Dikembe Mutombo into major aggression on the court. (His words for the 1999-2000 NBA MVP voter who prevented him from the league’s first unanimous win are profanely hilarious.)
O’Neal makes it clear that strong figures in his life provided discipline and guidance — beginning with the military-influenced upbringing of his stepfather, then coaches who could teach him how to be a great player like Phil Jackson and Pat Riley — made him who he is. He has always been a personality and time has been kinder to some of the behavior that was once considered brash. Now he’s a worldwide brand known even to non-sports fans. Those viewers, along with diehard basketball fans, will enjoy getting to know him better in this docuseries.
Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
Part 1 of Shaq premieres Wednesday, Nov. 23 at 9 p.m. ET on HBO. Each of the three episodes will premiere on the subsequent Wednesday, through Dec. 14. The docuseries will also stream on HBO Max and be available on-demand, with repeat airings on HBO networks.
Ian Casselberry is a sports media columnist for BSM. He has previously written and edited for Awful Announcing, The Comeback, Sports Illustrated, Yahoo Sports, MLive, Bleacher Report, and SB Nation. You can find him on Twitter @iancass or reach him by email at firstname.lastname@example.org.