Connect with us
Outkick 360

BSM Writers

Phil Inzinga Didn’t Think Any Of This Would Work

“I clearly have to know who’s playing who on what day, but as far as the meat and potatoes and intricacies of sports, that’s what the fellas do.”

Published

on

Phil Inzinga didn’t think it would work, but he really needed it to. The idea of hosting a sports radio show seemed crazy, maybe even borderline insane, but there was no way he could turn down the opportunity. Inzinga wasn’t a sports radio listener, nor did he have an extensive knowledge about sports. To be frank, he was limited in both of those areas when Larry Bastida, former GM of WWLS The Sports Animal in Oklahoma City, approached him about being a co-host in morning drive. 

May be an image of 1 person

Inzinga’s radio credentials weren’t a question, he had been on the air in multiple markets across the country. But all of those stops were doing either country, contemporary hits or rock radio. Not a single minute of his career had been spent doing sports. 

“To me, at the time, sports radio wasn’t good or bad, I was kind of indifferent to it,” said Inzinga. “But did I ever think in a million years I would be working in sports radio? The answer is no.”

Aside from his talent behind the mic, one thing that was very attractive to the Sports Animal was the special chemistry Inzinga had with his co-host Ron Benton, who goes by Spinozi on the radio. The duo had the type of chemistry each show strives for. Within minutes of listening to their show on Bob FM, a classic rock station, you knew their connection was different. Not only did they click, but they actually got along. Now that The Sports Animal had an opening in its morning drive slot, the station wanted a piece of it. 

The initial plan was simple. Spinozi was brought over first to co-host with Carey Murdock and Curtis Fitzpatrick, to make sure the trio clicked. 

“All the while, every morning, Curtis would come over and say, you know you’re next,” Inzinga said. “You’re coming with Spinozi. I said, Curtis, that’s a horrible idea.”

Unlike Inzinga, Spinozi had a background in sports radio, during his time in Baltimore. Talking sports was second nature to him. 

“Once they brought Spinozi over I think the plan had always been to bring me with him but they wanted to make sure the chemistry was right between those three guys first,” Inzinga said. “I think they knew I was going to be fine, as far as chemistry and radio stuff.”

Though he was unsure on how he was going to adapt to talking sports every morning, Inzinga knew the path to success was to continue to be who he is and not try to be the sports guy he wasn’t. It was a new format, but his goal was to be the same funny, entertaining host he had always been. 

“We kind of had a deal where we said, ok, we’ll give this a try, because I really didn’t think it would work,” Inzinga said. “We’re going to give it a try but we’re not going to change who we are or try to fill the roles of the previous two members of the show. We were going to do what we do on a sports radio show.”

Now, the challenging part was about to begin. Sure, Inzinga and Spinozi had an undeniably great chemistry, but they had to figure out how to mesh and connect with Murdock and Fitzpatrick on a similar level. Finding chemistry with two hosts can be tough enough, but a four-man show, where half of the hosts have limited sports radio experience? This was a huge gamble. 

“The funny thing is, I’d say within 25 minutes of the first show, we just knew it was going to work,” Inzinga said. “We just knew it. Everybody got along and that’s really rare.”

There were two major factors that contributed to the seamless transition of Inzinga and Spinozi joining The Morning Animals. One, was the fact that everyone involved with the show was all-in on making it work. Nobody disagreed with bringing on two guys that were doing classic rock radio, nor did anyone disagree with retaining Murdock and Fitzpatrick. It was truly a team effort to make this bold decision work.

The Morning Animals on Twitter: ".@Savastanos thanks to @billhaisten we got  to enjoy some of your awesome Chicago style deep dish pizza!  http://t.co/BFFlv5OOvr"

“But sometimes that’s not enough,” Inzinga said. “We got very lucky with the chemistry and it was one of those things where we all hit it off right away. The cool thing about our show is we’ll fight and argue on the air but it’s never personal. It’s always about the show and we’ve always been able to work things out. But chemistry is the biggest part of that show.”

The second biggest factor, and the most important one, is the fact that each host knows his role and never has a big enough ego to disrupt the flow of the show. As rare as that is, it’s what makes The Morning Animals as successful as it is. Inzinga plays that role perfectly. He may not have the extensive sports knowledge Murdock or Fitzpatrick has, but he also doesn’t pretend that he does. His role is to be funny and bring the entertainment aspect to the show, which he does perfectly. He never thought in a million years he’d do sports radio, but now, you can’t have The Morning Animals without Inzinga. 

“Everybody knows their role on our show and that’s incredibly important,” Inzinga said. “ It’s very established characters, I use the term character, they’re not really characters, it’s us being ourselves, but the personalities are very defined. You know which guys are talking. There’s no ego involved, literally, our thought is we just want the show to sound great, because if that happens, then we all will be good.”

Inzinga has been a part of The Morning Animals since 2013 and has seen his show near the top of the BSM Top 20 for best morning show multiple times. He doesn’t plan to slow down anytime soon, but he also doesn’t ever envision himself turning into a hot-take sports guy. There’s really no need to when he’s surrounded by the co-hosts he currently has. 

“I’ve got three guys, three alpha males, who are incredibly knowledgeable about sports,” Inzinga said. “That’s why it’s so great for me because I don’t have to be as knowledgeable as they are. I clearly have to know who’s playing who on what day, but as far as the meat and potatoes and intricacies of sports, that’s what the fellas do. What I do is kind of the showbiz aspect to it to make sure we transition in and out of breaks cleanly. There’s comedic elements to most of what we do. We want to make a show where you may not be the most sports savvy person, but you can certainly tune in and understand what we’re talking about.”

What listeners may not know is Inzinga is way more involved with the show than just being the funny co-host who talks about whether it’s ok to eat rotisserie chicken in the car. Essentially, he’s the maestro of the show, doubling as the executive producer. It seems to be a trend in radio that one of the co-hosts is also the producer and running the board. It works, yes, but it’s a cost-cutting measure that many hosts aren’t necessarily a fan of. Inzinga enjoys being the executive producer and co-host of his show, but doesn’t necessarily want every show to move in that direction. 

“We have a really lucky situation with four co-hosts and a producer on top of me producing,” Inzinga said. “When I’m driving the show I have a guy to cut up audio while I’m on the air. That’s our guy Q-tip. We love him and we’ve gotten lucky two times in a row with producers, before him we had Michael Doughty, who’s just amazing. Do I think it’s in the future, yeah, it probably is. The more they can cut costs the happier corporate radio is. Once you lose something you barely get it back. Yeah I think it unfortunately might be the future, and it’s something you can definitely do, but I don’t like it. I like shows that sound big and fun and funny.”

I couldn’t agree more with Inzinga. Make me laugh, be relatable and don’t take yourself too seriously. It’s like these guys have that painted on a wall in the studio, because they seem to achieve those three things every show. That’s what makes them such an easily likeable show. Also, it’s easy to like a show when you can tell all of the hosts like each other. 

“Spinozi, I love that he’s been living a beer commercial since I’ve known him,” laughed Inzinga. “He’s literally living the life and that’s not an exaggeration. He’s living the life of a 90’s beer commercial and it hasn’t stopped.

The Morning Animals bring sports and levity to listeners during the work  commute | Community & Lifestyle | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma Gazette
Courtesy: Oklahoma Gazette

“I love Carey’s vinyl collecting,” continued Inzinga. “I love all the stuff he does that’s not sports related. He’s such a quirky guy and I love the quirks. He’s a single guy with a disposable income like you would not believe. He’s living a very fun life.”

“Curtis keeps the show honest and professional,” added Spinozi. “He’s like an encyclopedia or a walking, talking sports almanac. And Curtis can be surprisingly funny when he wants to be.”

BSM Writers

Sports Are Learning To Meet Gen Z Where They Are

“The crux of the issue is that Gen Z is the first generation of kids who are truly free to find their “thing” in a way previous generations never could thanks to modern connectivity.”

Published

on

Should sports radio be concerned about where audiences will come from in the future? It is an interesting question that we talk about here a lot. It is also something that the New York Times tackled indirectly last week.

A column from Joe Drape and Ken Belson declared this generation of kids “The eSports Generation” and went on to explain just how disconnected from traditional sports they really are.

An alarmist might ask if this is the beginning of the end of traditional sports leagues. Someone a little more level-headed, like Joe Ovies, may want to dive a little deeper to see what leagues are learning and how they are adapting.

Joe hosts The OG in afternoon drive at 99.9 The Fan in Raleigh. He is always interested in how changes in technology and consumption patterns effect sports and his audience. I saw him tweeting about the New York Times piece last week and asked if he would want to write a little something for us.

Enjoy!

Demetri Ravanos


“Meet your audience where they are.”

How many times have you heard that phrase in the last 5 years from a consultant, manager, or any number of Barrett Media posts as content consumption trends continue to spread out over a variety of platforms? Turns out the same applies for pro sports leagues, who are fearful that an entire generation of fans will be lost and their traditional business model will crater as a result.

The New York Times recently highlighted what sports marketers are doing to win over Generation Z, which typically applies to kids born from 1997 to 2012. The Times hits the usual beats.

There’s a reference to Tyler “Ninja” Blevins, an esports star who is also a traditional sports fan, who the NFL hoped would be a Pied Piper for youth fandom. There are examples of MLB, famously stingy when it came to fans using their content on social media, now working with TikTok influencers. And of course, highlighting the NBA’s wide ranging approach to online engagement and their franchise run NBA 2K esports league. Most of the article was based on a recent SSRS/Luker on Trends report, which conducts regular surveys about sports and society.

The issue for pro sports leagues isn’t that Gen Z kids aren’t “passionate” enough about sports. It’s that Gen Z is more likely to admit they simply don’t like sports.

“Only 23 percent of Generation Z said they were passionate sports fans, compared with the 42 percent of millennials (defined as 26 to 41), 33 percent of Generation X (42 to 57) and 31 percent of baby boomers (57 to 76) who identified themselves as passionate. More striking was that 27 percent of Gen Zers said they disliked sports altogether, compared with just 7 percent of millennials, 5 percent of Gen Xers and 6 percent of boomers.”

The new york times, Jan. 12, 2022

Also factoring into the waning interest in sports from Gen Z is the dramatic decline of youth sports participation. There is a larger discussion to be had about the role of parents and specialization in this decline, but we can address that topic another day. As it relates to pro sports leagues today, the drop in youth participation absolutely impacts the level of interest in kids who might want to watch the best in the world of sports do their thing.

“Participation in youth sports was declining even before Covid-19: In 2018, only 38 percent of children ages 6 to 12 played team sports on a regular basis, down from 45 percent in 2008, according to the Sports & Fitness Industry Association.

In June 2020, the pandemic’s early days, 19 percent of parents with kids in youth sports said their child was not interested in playing sports, according to a survey conducted by The Aspen Institute’s Sports and Society Program. By September 2021, that figure was 28 percent.

On average, children play less than three years in a sport and quit by age 11, according to the survey. Why? Mostly, because it is not fun anymore.”

the New york times, Dec. 19th 2021

The crux of the issue is that Gen Z is the first generation of kids who are truly free to find their “thing” in a way previous generations never could thanks to modern connectivity. Meeting up on the playground or at a friend’s backyard for a pickup game has been replaced with meeting your friends on a Discord server and deciding if you’re going to play Halo or Call or Duty after school.

If you have kids in the age range that I do, none of this should be a surprise. You see it every day and don’t even think twice about it. But if you do stop and think about how frictionless it has become to be online all day with your friends, you start to realize the impact of never being bored or getting dragged to things by your parent because there were no other options.

Watching sports and going to sporting events isn’t frictionless. It’s a pain in the ass. Older generations deal with it because we don’t know any better, it’s just what we do. But Gen Z isn’t about to stop what they’re doing just to watch a game. Why would they? They can get the highlights later.

Gen Z is about dropping in and out of entertainment options whenever they feel like it. In other words, why would they sit around waiting for their favorite song to be played on the radio when they can easily pull it up on YouTube or Spotify.

Pro sports leagues can create all the social content and tout billions of views. They can tout engagement with Gen Z because a bunch of kids bought NFL related skins in Fortnite.

Awareness of their leagues isn’t the problem. It’s getting Gen Z to care enough to watch the game. Take my kids, who are fully aware of what’s going on in the world of sports, but getting them to sit down and actually watch the game is torture. Throw in the increasing cost to attend sporting events, I’ve started leaving them at home because it’s a waste of money given my 13-year-old is just gonna play Clash Royale in that $75 seat.

To be clear — I’m OK with my kids just not being into sports. It’s not like I didn’t try. It’s simply understanding we’ve transitioned to a world of niche communities. You can still thrive within those niche communities. Just look at sports talk radio as an example, where you’re not winning with cume, but with passion around sports. That’s what great sports talk radio stations sell. Pro sports leagues will be fine doing the same.

Continue Reading

BSM Writers

How Soon Is Too Soon To Lean Into The NFL Draft?

“I think there will be even more hype and content leading up to Draft than last year.”

Published

on

Las Vegas Raiders

For sports talk hosts, nothing generates content quite like the NFL Playoffs. The country’s most popular sport inches closer each week to crowning a champion. Each game produces an unlikely hero, a questionable call or some other storyline that can generate an entire show’s worth of conversation. Around the country, most stations talking about football are talking about the playoffs.

There is a select group of markets though where it makes sense for the football conversation to be driven by something else. Sure, the playoffs are on the radar, but if you are in a market with a top five draft pick, it makes sense that prospects and potential trades will draw significant interest.

Houston is not completely ignoring the playoffs. Landry Locker, co-host of In The Loop on Sports Radio 610 says that just like everywhere else in the country, NFL football is the headliner.

“We cover the NFL Playoffs top-to-bottom whether the Texans are in or not,” he told me. “However, just like all of our content we try to localize it as much as possible and try to respect the fact that we are a local show. Why do Houstonians care about what happened in each Wild Card game? What are the local ties?”

And what about the NFL Draft? The Texans have the third pick. That means there are plenty of discussions worth having on air, especially with the local team being so quarterback-needy.

I asked Landry if the lack of a Trevor Lawrence or Joe Burrow has dulled interest in the draft for Texans fans compared to what it could have been.

“I think there will be even more hype and content leading up to Draft than last year. While this QB class isn’t as good as last year’s the speculation about Russell Wilson, Aaron Rodgers and Deshaun Watson make up for that void because if any of those three are traded it will likely be before the Draft. The NFL offseason has become the most active in sports and this year’s will be as wild as ever, especially here in Houston with the Watson drama.”

Ryan Green, better known to Jacksonville sports fans as Hacker on 1010XL, is in a familiar position. Just last year, he and his colleagues on XL Primetime were talking about the Jaguars welcoming a new coach to town and holding the first pick in the draft. By the time the NFL Draft gets here in April, the Jaguars will be holding the first pick as they welcome a new coach to town. So how does Hacker ensure that this year’s conversations don’t sound like 2021’s conversations on air?

“We will discuss what went wrong last year and how not to duplicate that this time around,” he said. “Why did last year fail? What could have been done differently and what needs to be different this time around. Also the history of back-to-back No. 1 picks for teams isn’t good, how can the Jaguars succeed when so many others have failed.”

Having the first pick of draft is great when you have the chance to grab the quarterback that can change your franchise’s fortunes. But the Jaguars experienced that last year and they have the top pick again.

Hacker said it perfectly. Last year was a failure for the Jaguars. Does that make his listeners a little less enthusiastic this time around?

Yes, he says. Last year was such a let down that there is a whole series of conversations fans want to have before they are ready to start breaking down prospects.

“Jaguar fans want the coaching and gm hires to be correct or the picks won’t matter anyway. Coaching matters and the Jaguar fans have had to endure a lot of bad coaching over the past decade. They want the right coach, then they will focus on the top pick”

Draft talk is fun. As Brandon Kravitz pointed out in his column earlier this week, it is a chance for fans of bad teams to feel real hope. Hope is the word right now in Houston too.

Locker says that there are so many factors that make this offseason one that Texans fans have been waiting three years for. His plan is to devote as much time to draft talk as possible.

“Obviously that’s fluid depending on what happens with the Stros and Rockets,” he says, “but this is going to be the wildest offseason in Texans franchise history. This will be the first time the Texans have had a first round selection in three drafts and with the possibility of getting even more compensation for Watson and a new coach it’s going to be nuts around here.”

It seems weird to type this, but Jacksonvillians know it is true. Hope can get old sometimes. When it is all you have ever been served, hope just doesn’t hit the same.

Hacker jokes that he and his co-workers know their way around a show rundown this time of year because this time of year never seems to end for the Jags.

“Draft talk for Jacksonville always starts around Thanksgiving, so we are already a month into draft talk before the playoffs even get here.”

Continue Reading

BSM Writers

Your Only Focus Should Be On What You Can Control

“We can’t press a Staples easy button and automatically make the audience more active, the sales team more diligent, or the editors gather every piece of sound.”

Published

on

Behavior Gap

The crybaby Cowboys are at it again. After Dallas lost its Wild Card playoff game to the San Francisco 49ers 23-17 on Sunday, there was plenty of blame and finger pointing. Big D’s fingers weren’t pointed at themselves and their ugly run defense, shaky quarterback play, and inability to avoid committing stupid penalties, right?

No no, it’s far easier to just blame the officials. Let’s shine a light on those guys instead!

The controversy occurred at the very end of the game. As the Cowboys trailed by six points with 14 seconds remaining, quarterback Dak Prescott rushed up the middle of the field for 17 yards. As Chris Berman would say, “Tick, tick tick tick tick.” Precious seconds were ticking away as umpire Ramon George rushed over to spot the football. Once Prescott spiked the ball to stop the clock, the final seconds had ticked away and the Cowboys lost the game.

Prescott said in his postgame press conference that the official “needs to be closer to the ball” to spot it more quickly, and the result of that not happening was “tough to accept.” When asked about fans throwing beer bottles and trash at the officiating crew, Prescott said, “Credit to them then. Credit to them.”

Wow, dude. Really? Hooray for assault? Cowboys head coach Mike McCarthy chimed in by saying, “We shouldn’t have had any problem getting the ball spotted there.”

This might be news to the Cowboys, but not every NFL official is going to have blazing speed mixed with the agility of a ballet dancer. The offense needs to allow enough time just in case the umpire doesn’t resemble a Cirque du Soleil performer. The Cowboys failed to do that.

The Cowboys also made a huge mistake in the final two minutes. Defensive end Randy Gregory drew a defensive holding penalty for bear hugging and tackling a 49ers offensive lineman. That stupid penalty directly impacted the limited time the Cowboys had at the end of the game. Prescott also had an awful 69.3 passer rating. For context, Dak’s 69.3 passer rating against the Niners was actually lower than the abysmal 69.7 passer rating New York Jets rookie quarterback Zach Wilson produced this season. Yuck.

But it’s someone else’s fault. Right, Cowboys? That’s what losers do; they point the finger at others.

For the Cowboys to make the loss about the officials is flat-out embarrassing. They spent more time whining about things they can’t control (officiating) compared to what they can control (their own performance).

The same thing happens in sports radio. A lot. Many people in the industry are consumed by what they can’t control rather than what they can. Several hosts focus on the time slot they want or the job they think they should have. News flash: that isn’t controllable. It’s also easy to complain about a lack of advertisers or sponsors, why listener engagement isn’t better with more calls and tweets, or why some postgame sound is missing on the cut sheet.

“We don’t have the sound? How do we not have the sound? Everybody else has it. How are we missing the same sound that all of the other shows have?”

MacGyver it, dude. Find another way. Focus on what you can control instead of what you can’t. As Patriots head coach Bill Belichick says, “Do your job.”

The truth is that there are a lot of things in sports radio that workers want to control, might even think they should control, but don’t actually dictate. We can’t press a Staples easy button and automatically make the audience more active, the sales team more diligent, or the editors gather every piece of sound. But we can focus our attention on many things we do have control over.

Former NFL head coach Jon Gruden once gave some great advice. Before he was known for his emailing ways, Gruden hosted the successful QB camp series on ESPN. I’ll never forget an episode with former Miami Hurricanes quarterback Brad Kaaya. The QB told Gruden, “It’s tough when each week you’re thinking, ‘Man, if I don’t play well, if I don’t throw for this many yards, if we don’t win, my coach might not be here the very next week.’ It’s tough on me ‘cause you spend time around these coaches, you meet the families, meet the kids, coach [Al] Golden recruited me. You grow close to him.”

Gruden stopped Kaaya and said, “Make this note here; worry about what you can control. Don’t worry about the things you can’t control. Because if you do start worrying about things that are out of your control, you’re going to become a freakin’ basket case like me.”

I love this advice. It’s so easy to get off track by focusing our energy in the wrong areas. The funny thing is that our thoughts might start in a good place but lead to a bad outcome. Kaaya was worried about his coach’s job status and family. That’s reasonable, but by doing so it added unnecessary pressure to the situation and shifted the QB’s focus to things he can’t control. That isn’t a good result.

I think it’s smart to constantly be aware of whether something is helping or hurting your ability to perform.

A lot of people in the sports radio industry are competitive maniacs. That isn’t automatically a bad thing at all. Being super competitive can fuel a great work ethic and provide a valuable edge. However, it can evolve into a roadblock once you become a bitter, competitive maniac. That’s a different story. The bitter competitive maniac becomes jaded, frustrated, and hung up on what other people have. How is any of that helpful? It’s much better to stay focused on things that help you do a good job, not get in the way of it happening.

The Cowboys couldn’t control whether the official spotted the ball faster or not, but they could’ve allowed more time in case the umpire wasn’t Usain Bolt 2.0. They had plenty of control over surrendering fewer than 169 yards rushing to San Fran and Prescott having a much better day. But the crybaby Cowboys will whine and whine instead of being more accountable.

Don’t be like them. Instead of focusing on what you can’t control, take a closer look at what you actually can control.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2021 Barrett Media.