Connect with us

BSM Writers

Maybe There’s No Such Thing As A Good Job

“The answer to “is this a great job” is a math problem. Everything has to be right in order for you to come to the correct answer.”

Demetri Ravanos




As I type this, there is a debate amongst college football fans. What is the best open job? Is it LSU or USC? Very dumb people will insist that Virginia Tech and Miami should be a part of that discussion too.

While the coaching carousel is a fun part of the college football season for us talking heads, I think trying to settle this debate is largely a fool’s endeavor every year.


College football is very similar to radio. There are no inherently good jobs. Every job’s quality and value is based largely on the situation. Some openings pay more, some have more support in place for you to succeed, but there is no job in either industry that is equally great for whoever gets it.

I tell everyone that reaches out to me about openings in our industry the same thing: don’t evaluate the job, evaluate your situation. Are you in need of real change or just some validation from your current job? Does your personality fit the market? Is the market somewhere you really want to be?

Look at how long Billy Napier has been at Louisiana. This will be the third consecutive coaching carousel where he is courted by multiple schools. So far, he has looked at what he has been offered and decided that none of it has been a significant upgrade over what he has going in Lafayette. That may change this year, but so far, his current situation hasn’t necessitated a change.

The answer to “is this a great job” is an algebra problem. The overall correct answer comes from finding the correct answers to smaller problems along the way. So here are some things to think about as you approach the job market.

First, the value of the job is going to change based on your performance. Right now, everyone that follows college football thinks that Alabama is a great job. It is easy to succeed there and the school has a booster base that is going to give a coach anything he says he needs to win.

I was in school there for not just one, but two coaching searches that saw the Crimson Tide be turned down by at least five coaches before it finally heard “yes!”. In the early 2000s, the job was seen as something of a garbage fire. Boosters were out of control. Expectations didn’t match the reality of the moment. The NCAA had just hit the school with a two year bowl ban and major scholarship reductions. I remember being a junior when Dennis Franchione bolted for Texas A&M and thinking “we are so screwed”.

So what changed from then to now? Oh nothing, the school just happened to hire the greatest coach in the history of the sport at any level. Nick Saban told the boosters that he would ask when their opinion or help was necessary, otherwise they needed to stay away. He built a machine of a program that churns out first round picks like Land O’ Lakes does butter. It is easy to change the perception of your job when the guy currently in it makes everything look so easy.

Now, look at Florida. It was supposed to be a turnkey operation. You’re in a state full of talent. You’re in the easier of the two divisions in the SEC. There’s a recent history of success. The job should be idiot proof, yet the last three hires have proven that just isn’t true. The reality is that Steve Spurrier and Urban Meyer were so good that they made the job look easy.


The same is true in radio. Is afternoon drive on WFAN the best gig in all of radio? I am sure Mike Francesa would say it is. Chris Carlin may have a different answer. Same goes for stations and time slots all over the country. Ask Mike Salk and Paul Gallant what they each think of the morning drive slot at ESPN 710 in Seattle. I’ll bet they offer two very different opinions.

Management in radio is like a bank. They will usually offer leniency and advantages to the people that have demonstrated they need them less. For some, that is great. For others, it is no help at all.

Along those lines, what does it mean when your boss is willing to give you a long leash? In the best cases, it means management understands they are asking for the moon and they recognize that takes a lot of time and support. In most cases though, it is a subtle message that your performance doesn’t really matter and that your station/team/department is an afterthought.

Look at Stanford University. David Shaw inherited a program from Jim Harbaugh in 2011 that was as good as it had ever been, and he came out of the gate strong. Now, ten years later, Stanford is back to being another also ran in the PAC-12 and there seems to be little to no urgency about the state of the football program. That is fine for Stanford. They are one of the country’s three or four most prestigious universities. What message do you think it sends to the people the school may be interested in hiring when they decide it is time to replace Shaw though?

This happens in radio all the time. I have worked with stations where a 60-something talent has let the game pass him by and he is still given a new contract. Across the country, there are countless examples of stations that have shuffled lineups when no one is having ratings success instead of making any meaningful changes.

The long leash is nice to a point. There’s no pressure. It means there is some job security there. It also means there are severe limitations to your ability to grow and earn more.

Finally, there are always outside factors that you will never have control over. Butch Davis is on his way out at Florida International and he absolutely obliterated the school administration on his way out the door. He told Brett McMurphy that it is “sabotaging” the football program.

Davis is a respected coach that brought immediate success to FIU. Behind the scenes though, he was dealing with a budget he could not effect. His players were forced to use hand-me-down pads from other schools. His coaches couldn’t go on the road to meet recruits in person. No uniform redesigns or upgrades were even considered in a sport where that tends to be used as a selling point.

Budgets can be similar in radio, but do you know what the real factor that is out of your control is? Meters.

Neilsen’s distribution of portable people meters has very little to do with stations’ needs and everything to do with their success. Sure, Nielsen will listen to complaints when GMs or PDs call, but they aren’t obligated to do anything to make the situation better.

Programmers, hosts, and producers can absolutely bust their asses. They can bend over backwards to deliver the most entertaining product the market has ever heard. If the bulk of the meters go to people that aren’t sports fans, it is irrelevant. If the ones that do go to sports fans go almost entirely to older members of the demo, it will be very hard for a newer station to make a dent against a heritage brand.

My column isn’t an indictment of radio or of college football. Outside of my family, those are literally my two favorite things in the world.

Nobody tell Star Wars I said that.

empire strikes back release date - Online Discount Shop for Electronics,  Apparel, Toys, Books, Games, Computers, Shoes, Jewelry, Watches, Baby  Products, Sports & Outdoors, Office Products, Bed & Bath, Furniture, Tools,  Hardware,
Courtesy: LucasFilm

Let’s just call this what it is. Like your relationship status on Facebook, determining whether or not a job is good in either field is complicated. We can boil college football jobs down to a simple yes or no because to us it is just content. To those coaches though, this is their real life. The same is true with you and radio gigs. It’s misguided to try and simplify these evaluations.

BSM Writers

The Future Is Now, Embrace Amazon Prime Video, AppleTV+

As annoying as streaming sports is and as much as I haven’t fully adapted to the habit yet, Amazon and Apple have done a magnificent job of trying to make the process as easy and simplified as possible.

Avatar photo




This week has been a reckoning for sports and its streaming future on Amazon Prime Video, AppleTV+, ESPN+, and more.

Amazon announced that Thursday Night Football, which averaged 13 million viewers, generated the highest number of U.S. sign ups over a three hour period in the app’s history. More people in the United States subscribed to Prime during the September 15th broadcast than they did during Black Friday, Prime Day, and Cyber Monday. It was also “the most watched night of primetime in Prime Video’s history,” according to Amazon executive Jay Marine. The NFL and sports in general have the power to move mountains even for some of the nation’s biggest and most successful brands.

This leads us to the conversation happening surrounding Aaron Judge’s chase for history. Judge has been in pursuit of former major leaguer Roger Maris’ record for the most home runs hit during one season in American League history.

The sports world has turned its attention to the Yankees causing national rights holders such as ESPN, Fox, and TBS to pick up extra games in hopes that they capture the moment history is made. Apple TV+ also happened to have a Yankees game scheduled for Friday night against the Red Sox right in the middle of this chase for glory.

Baseball fans have been wildin’ out at the prospects of missing the grand moment when Judge passes Maris or even the moments afterwards as Judge chases home run number 70 and tries to truly create monumental history of his own. The New York Post’s Andrew Marchand has even reported there were talks between YES, MLB, and Apple to bring Michael Kay into Apple’s broadcast to call the game, allow YES Network to air its own production of the game, or allow YES Network to simulcast Apple TV+’s broadcast. In my opinion, all of this hysteria is extremely bogus.

As annoying as streaming sports is and as much as I haven’t fully adapted to the habit yet, Amazon and Apple have done a magnificent job of trying to make the process as easy and simplified as possible. Amazon brought in NBC to help with production of TNF and if you watch the flow of the broadcast, the graphics of the broadcast, NBC personalities like Michael Smith, Al Michaels, and Terry McAuliffe make appearances on the telecast – it is very clear that the network’s imprint is all over the show.

NBC’s experience in conducting the broadcast has made the viewing experience much more seamless. Apple has also used MLB Network and its personalities for assistance in ensuring there’s no major difference between what you see on air vs. what you’re streaming.

Amazon and Apple have also decided to not hide their games behind a paywall. Since the beginning of the season, all of Apple’s games have been available free of charge. No subscription has ever been required. As long as you have an Apple device and can download Apple TV+, you can watch their MLB package this season.

Guess what? Friday’s game against the Red Sox is also available for free on your iPhone, your laptop, or your TV simply by downloading the AppleTV app. Amazon will also simulcast all Thursday Night Football games on Twitch for free. It may be a little harder or confusing to find the free options, but they are out there and they are legal and, once again, they are free.

Apple has invested $85 million into baseball, money that will go towards your team becoming better hypothetically. They’ve invested money towards creating a new kind of streaming experience. Why in the hell would they offer YES Network this game for free? There’s no better way for them to drive subscriptions to their product than by offering fans a chance at watching history on their platform.

A moment like this are the main reason Apple paid for rights in the first place. When Apple sees what the NFL has done for Amazon in just one week and coincidentally has the ability to broadcast one of the biggest moments in baseball history – it would be a terrible business decision to let viewers watch it outside of the Apple ecosystem and lose the ability to gain new fans.

It’s time for sports fans to grow up and face reality. Streaming is here to stay. 

MLB Network is another option

If you don’t feel like going through the hassle of watching the Yankees take on the Red Sox for free on Apple TV+, MLB Network will also air all of Judge’s at bats live as they are happening. In case the moment doesn’t happen on Apple TV+ on Friday night, Judge’s next games will air in full on MLB Network (Saturday), ESPN (Sunday), MLB Network again (Monday), TBS (Tuesday) and MLB Network for a third time on Wednesday. All of MLB Network’s games will be simulcast of YES Network’s local New York broadcast. It wouldn’t shock me to see Fox pick up another game next Thursday if the pursuit still maintains national interest.

Quick bites

  • One of the weirdest things about the experience of streaming sports is that you lose the desire to channel surf. Is that a good thing or bad thing? Brandon Ross of LightShed Ventures wonders if the difficulty that comes with going from app to app will help Amazon keep viewers on TNF the entire time no matter what the score of the game is. If it does, Amazon needs to work on developing programming to surround the games or start replaying the games, pre and post shows so that when you fall asleep and wake up you’re still on the same stream on Prime Video or so that coming to Prime Video for sports becomes just as much of a habit for fans as tuning in to ESPN is.
  • CNN has announced the launch of a new morning show with Don Lemon, Poppy Harlow and Kaitlin Collins. Variety reports, “Two people familiar with plans for the show say it is likely to use big Warner Bros. properties — a visit from the cast of HBO’s Succession or sports analysis from TNT’s NBA crew — to lure eyeballs.” It’ll be interesting to see if Turner Sports becomes a cornerstone of this broadcast. Will the NBA start doing schedule releases during the show? Will a big Taylor Rooks interview debut on this show before it appears on B/R? Will the Stanley Cup or Final Four MVP do an interview on CNN’s show the morning after winning the title? Does the show do remote broadcasts from Turner’s biggest sports events throughout the year?
  • The Clippers are back on over the air television. They announced a deal with Nexstar to broadcast games on KTLA and other Nexstar owned affiliates in California. The team hasn’t reached a deal to air games on Bally Sports SoCal or Bally Sports Plus for the upcoming season. Could the Clippers pursue a solo route and start their own OTT service in time for the season? Are they talking to Apple, Amazon, or ESPN about a local streaming deal? Is Spectrum a possible destination? I think these are all possibilities but its likely that the Clippers end up back on Bally Sports since its the status quo. I just find it interesting that it has taken so long to solidify an agreement and that it wasn’t announced in conjunction with the KTLA deal. The Clippers are finally healthy this season, moving into a new arena soon, have the technology via Second Spectrum to produce immersive game casts. Maybe something is brewing?
  • ESPN’s Monday Night Football double box was a great concept. The execution sucked. Kudos to ESPN for adjusting on the fly once complaints began to lodge across social media. I think the double box works as a separate feed. ESPN2 should’ve been the home to the double box. SVP and Stanford Steve could’ve held a watch party from ESPN’s DC studio with special guests. The double box watch party on ESPN2 could’ve been interrupted whenever SVP was giving an update on games for ESPN and ABC. It would give ESPN2 a bit of a behind the scenes look at how the magic happens similarly to what MLB Tonight did last week. Credit to ESPN and the NFL for experimenting and continuing to try and give fans unique experiences.

Continue Reading

BSM Writers

ESPN Shows Foresight With Monday Night Football Doubleheader Timing

ESPN is obviously testing something, and it’s worth poking around at why the network wouldn’t follow the schedule it has used for the last 16 years, scheduling kickoffs at 7 and then 10 on their primary channel.

Avatar photo




The Monday Night Football doubleheader was a little bit different this time around for ESPN.

First, it came in Week 2 instead of Week 1. And then, the games were staggered 75 minutes apart on two different channels, the Titans and Bills beginning on ESPN at 7:15 PM ET and the Vikings at the Eagles starting at 8:30 PM on ABC and ESPN+. This was a departure from the usual schedule in which the games kicked off at 7:00 PM ET and then 10:00 PM ET with the latter game on the West Coast.

ESPN is obviously testing something, and it’s worth poking around at why the network wouldn’t follow the schedule it has used for the last 16 years, scheduling kickoffs at 7:00 PM and then 10:00 PM ET on their primary channel. That’s the typical approach, right? The NFL is the most valuable offering in all of sports and ESPN would have at least six consecutive hours of live programming without any other game to switch to.

Instead, they staggered the starts so the second game kicked off just before the first game reached halftime. They placed the games on two different channels, which risked cannibalizing their audience. Why? Well, it’s the same reason that ESPN was so excited about the last year’s Manningcast that it’s bringing it back for 10 weeks this season. ESPN is not just recognizing the reality of how their customers behave, but they’re embracing it.

Instead of hoping with everything they have that the customer stays in one place for the duration of the game, they’re recognizing the reality that they will leave and providing another product within their portfolio to be a destination when they do.

It’s the kind of experiment everyone in broadcasting should be investigating because, for all the talk about meeting the customer where they are, we still tend to be a little bit stubborn about adapting to what they do. 

Customers have more choices than ever when it comes to media consumption. First, cable networks softened the distribution advantages of broadcast networks, and now digital offerings have eroded the distribution advantages of cable networks. It’s not quite a free-for-all, but the battle for viewership is more intense, more wide open than ever because that viewer has so many options of not just when and where but how they will consume media.

Programmers have a choice in how to react to this. On the one hand, they can hold on tighter to the existing model and try to squeeze as much out of it as they can. If ESPN was thinking this way it would stack those two Monday night games one after the other just like it always has and hope like hell for a couple of close games to juice the ratings. Why would you make it impossible for your customer to watch both of these products you’ve paid so much to televise?

I’ve heard radio programmers and hosts recite take this same approach for more than 10 years now when it comes to making shows available on-demand. Why would you give your customers the option of consuming the product in a way that’s not as remunerative or in a way that is not measured?

That thinking is outdated and it is dangerous from an economic perspective because it means you’re trying to make the customer behave in your best interest by restricting their choices. And maybe that will work. Maybe they like that program enough that they’ll consume it in the way you’d prefer or maybe they decide that’s inconvenient or annoying or they decide to try something else and now this customer who would have listened to your product in an on-demand format is choosing to listen to someone else’s product entirely.

After all, you’re the only one that is restricting that customer’s choices because you’re the only one with a desire to keep your customer where he is. Everyone else is more than happy to give your customer something else. 

There’s a danger in holding on too tightly to the existing model because the tighter you squeeze, the more customers will slip through your fingers, and if you need a physical demonstration to complete this metaphor go grab a handful of sand and squeeze it hard.

Your business model is only as good as its ability to predict the behavior of your customers, and as soon as it stops doing that, you need to adjust that business model. Don’t just recognize the reality that customers today will exercise the freedom that all these media choices provide, embrace it.

Offer more products. Experiment with more ways to deliver those products. The more you attempt to dictate the terms of your customer’s engagement with your product, the more customers you’ll lose, and by accepting this you’ll open yourself to the reality that if your customer is going to leave your main offering, it’s better to have them hopping to another one of your products as opposed to leaving your network entirely.

Think in terms of depth of engagement, and breadth of experience. That’s clearly what ESPN is doing because conventional thinking would see the Manningcast as a program that competes with the main Monday Night Football broadcast, that cannibalizes it. ESPN sees it as a complimentary experience. An addition to the main broadcast, but it also has the benefit that if the customer feels compelled to jump away from the main broadcast – for whatever reason – it has another ESPN offering that they may land on.

I’ll be watching to see what ESPN decides going forward. The network will have three Monday Night Football doubleheaders beginning next year, and the game times have not been set. Will they line them up back-to-back as they had up until this year? If they do it will be a vote of confidence that its traditional programming approach that evening is still viable. But if they overlap those games going forward, it’s another sign that less is not more when it comes to giving your customers a choice in products.

Continue Reading

BSM Writers

Media Noise: Sunday Ticket Has Problems, Marcellus Wiley Does Not

Demetri Ravanos




On this episode of Media Noise, Demetri is joined by Brian Noe to talk about the wild year FS1’s Marcellus Wiley has had and by Garrett Searight to discuss the tumultuous present and bright future of NFL Sunday Ticket.






Continue Reading
Advertisement blank
Advertisement blank

Barrett Media Writers

Copyright © 2021 Barrett Media.